Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Powell County, Montana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 80
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Powell County, Montana totaled $1,070,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mannix Brothers Inc | Helmville, MT 59843 | $93,036 |
2 | Bignell Ranch Co | Helmville, MT 59843 | $48,291 |
3 | Graveley Brothers, LLC. | Avon, MT 59713 | $48,111 |
4 | Manley Family Limited Partnership | Drummond, MT 59832 | $43,600 |
5 | Wild Wheat Ranch | Kalispell, MT 59904 | $42,223 |
6 | Steve M Graveley | Helmville, MT 59843 | $36,942 |
7 | Bignell Angus Ranch Inc | Avon, MT 59713 | $36,415 |
8 | Earl Stucky | Avon, MT 59713 | $31,260 |
9 | Donald Robert Beck | Gold Creek, MT 59733 | $29,073 |
10 | Leland Dutch Weaver | Drummond, MT 59832 | $27,546 |
11 | Amadeo F Angelo | Drummond, MT 59832 | $27,300 |
12 | Geary Brothers Inc | Helmville, MT 59843 | $26,190 |
13 | Aspen Grove Ranch LLC | Deer Lodge, MT 59722 | $23,389 |
14 | Melany Mannix | Avon, MT 59713 | $22,846 |
15 | Mcintosh Ranch Llp | Avon, MT 59713 | $22,251 |
16 | Dutton Hereford Ranch | Gold Creek, MT 59733 | $21,762 |
17 | Blackfoot River Ranch Inc | Helmville, MT 59843 | $21,387 |
18 | 5 Rockin' Ms Angus Ranch Inc | Bridgeport, TX 76426 | $21,272 |
19 | Patricia C Bignell | Hall, MT 59837 | $20,948 |
20 | Ashcraft Ranch Inc | Twin Bridges, MT 59754 | $19,123 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>