Conservation Reserve Program in Roosevelt County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,258
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Roosevelt County, Montana totaled $107,418,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kar Inc | Culbertson, MT 59218 | $656,930 |
22 | Ferdina Ranch Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $647,721 |
23 | James F Helmer | Culbertson, MT 59218 | $641,690 |
24 | Kay Smith Ahern | Scottsdale, AZ 85253 | $618,499 |
25 | Edwin Bertino | Billings, MT 59102 | $608,963 |
26 | Elyse Matejovsky | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $598,159 |
27 | Wayne K Giese | Sidney, MT 59270 | $569,653 |
28 | Robert Rudolph | Bainville, MT 59212 | $558,591 |
29 | Connie Zimmerman | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $553,235 |
30 | Gary A Sethre | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $543,001 |
31 | Gordon Luft | Froid, MT 59226 | $539,019 |
32 | Bartel Ranch Inc | Cody, WY 82414 | $538,947 |
33 | Brent J Toavs | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $532,816 |
34 | Nyquist/trust/kenneth V | Seattle, WA 98102 | $530,081 |
35 | Gary Ediger | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $525,769 |
36 | Gennet M L Smith | Bainville, MT 59212 | $524,999 |
37 | The Bridges Family Limited Partne | Scobey, MT 59263 | $523,171 |
38 | Roy Corporation | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $516,609 |
39 | Robert Gess | Billings, MT 59106 | $508,603 |
40 | Houg Farms Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $500,891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”