Farm Subsidy information
Roosevelt County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Roosevelt County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 558
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Roosevelt County, Montana totaled $28,757,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chanel Johnson | Homestead, MT 59242 | $183,387 |
22 | Berwick Farms LLC | Culbertson, MT 59218 | $180,042 |
23 | Kenneth Davis | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $177,103 |
24 | Lars E Foens | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $166,081 |
25 | Larry Hekkel | Culbertson, MT 59218 | $164,416 |
26 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $157,691 |
27 | Kelly S Toavs | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $155,023 |
28 | Christopher Thomas Hansen | Bainville, MT 59212 | $153,968 |
29 | Bears Coulee Ranch LLC | Bainville, MT 59212 | $146,110 |
30 | David V Matejovsky | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $145,122 |
31 | Whitney Rush | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $144,193 |
32 | Syvert James Mahlen | Williston, ND 58801 | $143,734 |
33 | Blake Murray | Froid, MT 59226 | $141,365 |
34 | Bush Ranch Inc | Poplar, MT 59255 | $140,843 |
35 | Houg Farms Inc | Wolf Point, MT 59201 | $139,372 |
36 | Western Coop Credit Union ** | Williston, ND 58802 | $136,765 |
37 | Terry Traeger | Bainville, MT 59212 | $136,515 |
38 | Schnitzler Corporation | Froid, MT 59226 | $134,024 |
39 | Glen A Bummer | Reserve, MT 59258 | $132,095 |
40 | John Nygard | Brockton, MT 59213 | $130,330 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”