Farm Subsidy information
Rosebud County, Montana
Total Subsidies in Rosebud County, Montana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 321
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $8,032,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John H Bailey | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $43,454 |
42 | Jesse R Lee | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $42,466 |
43 | Christian K Bends | Ashland, MT 59003 | $41,820 |
44 | Timothy Davis | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $40,262 |
45 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $40,258 |
46 | Nile Enterprises Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $39,204 |
47 | Seth Murnion | Jordan, MT 59337 | $38,764 |
48 | Lana Hoff | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $38,471 |
49 | Errol T Galt | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $38,108 |
50 | Sharrie Galt | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $38,108 |
51 | Daniel Valdez | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $37,934 |
52 | Nance Cattle Co | Birney, MT 59012 | $37,825 |
53 | Jack L Ferguson | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $35,994 |
54 | Wayne Helland | Miles City, MT 59301 | $33,724 |
55 | Don D Polich | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $33,378 |
56 | Paul Neiman-neiman Family Revocable Trust | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $32,647 |
57 | Gene T Small | Lame Deer, MT 59043 | $31,277 |
58 | Bailey Cattle Company LLC | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $30,323 |
59 | Colton Thomas Allen | Melstone, MT 59054 | $28,508 |
60 | Felton Angus Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $28,233 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”