Total Commodity Programs in Rosebud County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 721
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $54,681,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Paul J Hofer | Sumatra, MT 59083 | $225,829 |
62 | Booth Land & Livestock | Lucerne, CO 80646 | $215,712 |
63 | V S Forsyth Inc | Sidney, MT 59270 | $211,262 |
64 | Glenn J Helland | Miles City, MT 59301 | $209,241 |
65 | Leroy Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $193,953 |
66 | Pearl Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $193,861 |
67 | Keefer Land & Livestock Co | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $191,221 |
68 | Cross Four Cattle LLC | Miles City, MT 59301 | $187,323 |
69 | Joan Steiger | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $186,042 |
70 | Cory R Luther | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $184,996 |
71 | Felton Angus Ranch Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $184,087 |
72 | Steve Thoeny | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $176,662 |
73 | Jack L Helland | Miles City, MT 59301 | $174,670 |
74 | Sorenson Farms | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $174,620 |
75 | Cole Michael Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $172,549 |
76 | Brian Schweitzer | Helena, MT 59601 | $171,218 |
77 | A Lazy S Ranch | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $171,037 |
78 | Eli Spannagel Jr | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $169,747 |
79 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $163,664 |
80 | John A Heidema | Fromberg, MT 59029 | $163,158 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”