Total Commodity Programs in Rosebud County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 718
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Rosebud County, Montana totaled $54,201,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wayne D Helland Inc | Miles City, MT 59301 | $565,710 |
22 | Betty L Helland | Miles City, MT 59301 | $532,045 |
23 | Mereness Farms | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $487,167 |
24 | Glen Leonhardt And Carla Leonhardt | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $479,906 |
25 | Jason Hirsch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $475,758 |
26 | Windancer Farms General Partnership | Miles City, MT 59301 | $461,712 |
27 | Dallas & Cindy Steiger | Hysham, MT 59038 | $456,900 |
28 | Larsen Land & Livestock Co | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $443,224 |
29 | Sharrie Galt | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $442,475 |
30 | Errol T Galt | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $441,862 |
31 | Three-n-farm | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $436,206 |
32 | Nile Enterprises Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $431,709 |
33 | 71 Ranch Lp | Martinsdale, MT 59053 | $429,452 |
34 | Schiffer Ranch Co | Rosebud, MT 59347 | $416,971 |
35 | Middle Fork Land & Livestock Inc | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $408,297 |
36 | Sorenson Farms Of Montana | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $398,677 |
37 | Red Butte Ranch | Miles City, MT 59301 | $356,936 |
38 | Cavin Steiger | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $356,250 |
39 | Paul-neiman Family R Neiman | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $351,553 |
40 | Asay Farms Partnership | Forsyth, MT 59327 | $344,125 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”