Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Toole County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 193
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Toole County, Montana totaled $2,710,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ratzburg Livestock & Grain | Ledger, MT 59456 | $299,910 |
2 | Rimrock Colony Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $270,055 |
3 | Big Rose Colony Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $224,092 |
4 | Camrose Colony Inc | Ledger, MT 59456 | $201,973 |
5 | West Butte Ranch | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $86,556 |
6 | Bobcat Angus Llp | Galata, MT 59444 | $81,632 |
7 | James Judisch Jr | Conrad, MT 59425 | $74,953 |
8 | Tomsheck D & L Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $63,544 |
9 | David Parsell | Whitlash, MT 59545 | $62,548 |
10 | Hillside Colony Inc | Sweet Grass, MT 59484 | $60,145 |
11 | Flesch Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $55,243 |
12 | Fretheim Brothers | Shelby, MT 59474 | $49,364 |
13 | Grassy Butte Farms Partnership | Galata, MT 59444 | $41,362 |
14 | Wayne A Gillespie | Kevin, MT 59454 | $37,515 |
15 | Simmes Ranch Inc | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $36,023 |
16 | Dennis A Fitzpatrick Jr | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $34,945 |
17 | Bnh Ranch Inc | Whitlash, MT 59545 | $31,483 |
18 | Marias River Ranches Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $29,867 |
19 | Michael Wallewein | Sunburst, MT 59482 | $27,354 |
20 | Tumbleweed Ranch LLC | Conrad, MT 59425 | $27,340 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>