Total Conservation Programs in Toole County, Montana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 875
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Toole County, Montana totaled $126,918,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M & M Farms | Shelby, MT 59474 | $2,042,929 |
| 2 | Iceland Farms | Ethridge, MT 59435 | $1,466,334 |
| 3 | R & S Grain | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,325,725 |
| 4 | Gary Kiefer Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,247,381 |
| 5 | Torval Halvorson | Kevin, MT 59454 | $1,217,916 |
| 6 | R W Kline | Woodburn, OR 97071 | $1,077,113 |
| 7 | Tyler Mclean | Cut Bank, MT 59427 | $1,063,806 |
| 8 | Glen Habets | Kevin, MT 59454 | $1,051,828 |
| 9 | Sun Ag Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,042,299 |
| 10 | Dnrc Trust Land Management - Exem | Helena, MT 59620 | $1,030,585 |
| 11 | Barbara J Monroe Trust | Kevin, MT 59454 | $1,021,380 |
| 12 | H Lavern Kinyon | Shelby, MT 59474 | $1,021,234 |
| 13 | Cash Coulee Ltd | Augusta, MT 59410 | $1,019,657 |
| 14 | Golden Fields Farm Inc | Galata, MT 59444 | $1,006,107 |
| 15 | Marshall Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $960,286 |
| 16 | Lucy Mclean | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $948,394 |
| 17 | H & J Quarters Inc | Mesa, AZ 85208 | $921,354 |
| 18 | Cab Farms Inc | Shelby, MT 59474 | $899,823 |
| 19 | Eldred Stratton | Shelby, MT 59474 | $884,207 |
| 20 | Benjamin Ag Enterprises Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $865,541 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf