Total Disaster Programs in Wheatland County, Montana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 326
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Wheatland County, Montana totaled $25,872,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | E.l. Peterson Ranch Inc. | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $315,900 |
22 | Moore Livestock | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $314,868 |
23 | Fred Taber | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $304,389 |
24 | Susan L Philippi | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $299,645 |
25 | Glenn R Berg | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $282,832 |
26 | Bar Nothing Ranch Partnership | Big Timber, MT 59011 | $273,301 |
27 | Bonny Lode | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $259,888 |
28 | Charles R Gaugler | Garneill, MT 59453 | $259,074 |
29 | Debuff Farms | Shawmut, MT 59078 | $250,000 |
30 | J & L Livestock LLC | Billings, MT 59105 | $248,978 |
31 | Hooker Cattle Co Inc | Ryegate, MT 59074 | $247,944 |
32 | Thomas N Glennie Jr | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $247,835 |
33 | Two Dot Land & Lvst Co | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $237,826 |
34 | Reversed R Livestock | Judith Gap, MT 59453 | $237,023 |
35 | Muir Ranch Company | Clinton, MT 59825 | $228,924 |
36 | , | $214,190 | |
37 | Michelle L Ward | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $213,806 |
38 | Lane Associates | Livingston, MT 59047 | $191,625 |
39 | Cooney Brothers Family Lmt Partne | Harlowton, MT 59036 | $181,086 |
40 | Richard A Moe | Two Dot, MT 59085 | $178,977 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”