Production Flexibility Program in Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 92,098
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Nebraska totaled $2,487,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Schuster Farms | Phillips, NE 68865 | $418,966 |
62 | Board Of Regents U Of N | Ithaca, NE 68033 | $411,973 |
63 | Nebraska Partners | Mead, NE 68041 | $403,533 |
64 | D & D Farms | Kearney, NE 68847 | $397,448 |
65 | Chohon Farms | Oneill, NE 68763 | $391,170 |
66 | J R Kaliff & Son | York, NE 68467 | $386,597 |
67 | R & R Farms | Aurora, NE 68818 | $383,904 |
68 | Hough Farms | David City, NE 68632 | $377,532 |
69 | Kirkholm Farms | South Sioux City, NE 68776 | $375,915 |
70 | Groeteke Brothers Partnership | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $375,473 |
71 | Westesen Farms Ptshp | Kearney, NE 68847 | $375,138 |
72 | Dose Land & Cattle | Hampton, NE 68843 | $374,344 |
73 | S S R Land Co | Shickley, NE 68436 | $373,192 |
74 | Oneida Farms Ptshp | Wilcox, NE 68982 | $369,322 |
75 | Moore Farms | Cambridge, NE 69022 | $367,822 |
76 | Raichart Ranch Partnership | Benkelman, NE 69021 | $367,680 |
77 | D & G Farms | York, SC 29745 | $367,278 |
78 | R & M Farms | Shickley, NE 68436 | $365,548 |
79 | Monnier Farms | Bradshaw, NE 68319 | $363,565 |
80 | Kenneth & Harland Layher Partners | Wood River, NE 68883 | $358,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”