Production Flexibility Program in Nebraska, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 92,098

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Nebraska totaled $2,487,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2021
1Kaliff FarmsYork, NE 68467$1,381,100
2C J Farms Gen PtnrHoldrege, NE 68949$1,180,011
3Niobrara FarmsAtkinson, NE 68713$1,147,892
4Danielski Harvesting & FarmingValentine, NE 69201$1,013,268
5Associated Foxley PartnershipLa Jolla, CA 92038$932,400
6H R W Farm PartnershipFriend, NE 68359$863,911
7Osantowski BrosBellwood, NE 68624$844,316
8Kason FarmsNorth Platte, NE 69103$814,901
9Bartlett PartnershipBartlett, NE 68622$797,712
10Merrill Land Company Gen PtnrshipOgallala, NE 69153$790,792
11Glenn Elting & SonsEdgar, NE 68935$742,884
12Western Nebraska Farm Company A GVenango, NE 69168$710,615
13Reynolds FarmsBroken Bow, NE 68822$653,244
14Wallinger Farm PartnershipStuart, NE 68780$651,425
15Marsh FarmsHartington, NE 68739$640,168
16Kracl Family PartnershipOneill, NE 68763$624,211
17Safranek IrrigationMerna, NE 68856$610,806
18J D Hirschfeld & SonsBenedict, NE 68316$600,611
19Woitaszewski Brothers JvWood River, NE 68883$597,176
20Orville Hoffschneider & SonsWaco, NE 68460$565,205

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag