Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,163
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Nebraska totaled $469,216,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Grothen Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $1,383,231 |
22 | Rex D Lukow | Holstein, NE 68950 | $1,380,273 |
23 | S & R Hollister Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $1,376,586 |
24 | Melvin R Trausch | Roseland, NE 68973 | $1,368,369 |
25 | Rak Farms Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $1,339,545 |
26 | C-n Farms Inc | Hastings, NE 68901 | $1,337,244 |
27 | Katzberg Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $1,336,042 |
28 | Murman Dairy Inc | Glenvil, NE 68941 | $1,335,947 |
29 | Bachman Farms Inc | Ayr, NE 68925 | $1,329,670 |
30 | Lanny Katzberg | Juniata, NE 68955 | $1,322,576 |
31 | Kda Farms Inc | Ayr, NE 68925 | $1,302,560 |
32 | Gerald F Frerichs | Hastings, NE 68901 | $1,265,804 |
33 | Bonifas Farms Inc | Roseland, NE 68973 | $1,264,176 |
34 | Walter Family Rev Trust | Hastings, NE 68902 | $1,260,041 |
35 | E & S Farms, Inc. | Hastings, NE 68901 | $1,249,965 |
36 | Rdo Farms Inc | Roseland, NE 68973 | $1,226,473 |
37 | James Vernon Meyer | Blue Hill, NE 68930 | $1,225,154 |
38 | Lisius Farms Inc | Juniata, NE 68955 | $1,224,924 |
39 | Rodney Buhr | Hastings, NE 68901 | $1,217,619 |
40 | Daniel P Kimle | Kenesaw, NE 68956 | $1,213,053 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”