Farm Subsidy information
Banner County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Banner County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,284
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Banner County, Nebraska totaled $142,138,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Darnall Ranch Inc | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $2,885,845 |
2 | Olsen Ranches Inc | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $2,774,932 |
3 | Hoehn Farms Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $2,038,345 |
4 | Tom May | Pine Bluffs, WY 82082 | $1,618,001 |
5 | Douglas L Olsen | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $1,344,232 |
6 | Mossberg Farms | Kimball, NE 69145 | $1,289,738 |
7 | Ronald G Bright | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $1,156,665 |
8 | Glo Inc | Kimball, NE 69145 | $1,127,559 |
9 | Holt Farm Inc | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $1,002,355 |
10 | Shirley May | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $992,404 |
11 | Harold L Brown Farms Inc | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $966,534 |
12 | Bryan G Huffman | Potter, NE 69156 | $915,386 |
13 | Windy Acres Inc | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $913,471 |
14 | Four Lazy H Inc | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $900,483 |
15 | Jaemco Inc | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $875,204 |
16 | Richard C Van Pelt | Kimball, NE 69145 | $869,700 |
17 | Kelly Sandberg | Gering, NE 69341 | $845,426 |
18 | J Bar 2 Producers Limited Partner | Harrisburg, NE 69345 | $801,515 |
19 | Palm-egle Land Company Inc | Denver, CO 80224 | $780,434 |
20 | Jack Cochran Farms Inc | Kimball, NE 69145 | $764,562 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>