Total Disaster Programs in Boone County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,256
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Boone County, Nebraska totaled $20,868,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Berger Farms Inc | Spalding, NE 68665 | $138,855 |
22 | Jerald Martin Nebel | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $129,697 |
23 | David Berger | Spalding, NE 68665 | $121,831 |
24 | Matthew L Pelster | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $116,034 |
25 | Pelster Farms Inc | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $113,272 |
26 | Nathan Alan Mueller | Albion, NE 68620 | $110,410 |
27 | Virgil David Seda | Albion, NE 68620 | $109,403 |
28 | Roberts Bros | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $107,978 |
29 | Ronald A Dozler | Albion, NE 68620 | $105,430 |
30 | Steven T Johnson | Albion, NE 68620 | $104,186 |
31 | Shawn Nicholas Gasper | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $103,859 |
32 | Baum & Bros Inc | Elgin, NE 68636 | $100,994 |
33 | Mogensen Bros Land & Cattle Co | Cedar Rapids, NE 68627 | $98,991 |
34 | Lee Ketteler | Albion, NE 68620 | $91,807 |
35 | Roger Voichoski | Albion, NE 68620 | $90,506 |
36 | Niewohner Bros Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $90,372 |
37 | Kenneth D Hinze | Albion, NE 68620 | $89,390 |
38 | James Gale Carder | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $87,205 |
39 | Tisthammer Farms Part | Albion, NE 68620 | $85,576 |
40 | Myron James Seier | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $83,198 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”