Farm Subsidy information
Boone County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Boone County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,764
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Boone County, Nebraska totaled $480,650,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jerome John Tenski | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $1,043,333 |
62 | Larry Rasmussen & Sons | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $1,039,836 |
63 | Leo J Diessner | Primrose, NE 68655 | $1,035,033 |
64 | Kevin Jon Rasmussen | Albion, NE 68620 | $1,004,565 |
65 | Seamann Farms Inc | Spalding, NE 68665 | $1,002,633 |
66 | Virgil David Seda | Albion, NE 68620 | $1,000,082 |
67 | Daniel Raymond Schroeter | Albion, NE 68620 | $982,055 |
68 | Dale J Hemmer | Humphrey, NE 68642 | $971,694 |
69 | Mjr Partners | Albion, NE 68620 | $968,045 |
70 | David Arnold Merrell | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $944,291 |
71 | Jfb Farms Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $941,118 |
72 | Kevin Joseph Borer | Albion, NE 68620 | $936,954 |
73 | Frey Circle J Farms Inc | Albion, NE 68620 | $928,161 |
74 | Douglas Mark Stuhr | Albion, NE 68620 | $927,669 |
75 | William Dean Klassen | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $926,832 |
76 | Donald F Seier | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $924,771 |
77 | Gasper Enterprises Inc | Saint Edward, NE 68660 | $924,546 |
78 | Randall D Pelster | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $922,873 |
79 | Gregory D Koetter | Albion, NE 68620 | $919,726 |
80 | Myron James Seier | Petersburg, NE 68652 | $908,552 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”