Farm Subsidy information
Cherry County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Cherry County, Nebraska, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 539
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cherry County, Nebraska totaled $7,835,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Danielski Harvesting & Farming | Valentine, NE 69201 | $107,821 |
| 2 | Double K Farms | Valentine, NE 69201 | $80,995 |
| 3 | Glen Coble & Sons Inc | Mullen, NE 69152 | $78,925 |
| 4 | Three Bar Cattle Co | Nenzel, NE 69219 | $77,193 |
| 5 | Britchin Cattle Co | Gordon, NE 69343 | $66,855 |
| 6 | Tk Angus Co | Wood Lake, NE 69221 | $66,200 |
| 7 | George W Shadbolt Jr | Gordon, NE 69343 | $61,727 |
| 8 | Brush Creek Ranch LLC | Thedford, NE 69166 | $60,292 |
| 9 | Phipps Land And Livestock Inc | Whitman, NE 69366 | $59,422 |
| 10 | Robert A Simmons | Cody, NE 69211 | $57,723 |
| 11 | Eatinger Cattle Co Inc | Thedford, NE 69166 | $57,094 |
| 12 | Bow And Arrow LLC | Valentine, NE 69201 | $55,524 |
| 13 | Carl Simmons | Valentine, NE 69201 | $54,875 |
| 14 | Art Brownlee | Ashby, NE 69333 | $51,396 |
| 15 | James A Hanna | Mullen, NE 69152 | $49,599 |
| 16 | Christopher Gentry | Hyannis, NE 69350 | $47,756 |
| 17 | J H Minor Company | Hyannis, NE 69350 | $43,932 |
| 18 | 66 Ranch Co Inc | Valentine, NE 69201 | $42,950 |
| 19 | A B Cox | Mullen, NE 69152 | $42,196 |
| 20 | Danny R Osburn | Wood Lake, NE 69221 | $40,362 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf