Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Morrill County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 39
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Morrill County, Nebraska totaled $90,788 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Laux Family Limited Partnership | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $9,925 |
2 | George Hall Family Trust | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $8,750 |
3 | Hall Land Inc | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $8,750 |
4 | Darrell Schuler II | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $4,342 |
5 | Michael A Linch Jr | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $3,500 |
6 | Bob Earl Hecht | Broadwater, NE 69125 | $3,298 |
7 | Michael R Oneal | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $3,050 |
8 | Kenneth H Korell | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $2,802 |
9 | Steve Kildow | Bayard, NE 69334 | $2,772 |
10 | Dale Hall | Broadwater, NE 69125 | $2,772 |
11 | Connie Lapaseotes Ltd | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $2,592 |
12 | Kent H Andreas | Bayard, NE 69334 | $2,578 |
13 | Gust And Dena Anest Family Living | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $2,523 |
14 | Wallace Mays | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $2,455 |
15 | Jerome Pohl | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $2,416 |
16 | Kirk Varah | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $2,286 |
17 | Henry Hass & Sons Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $2,245 |
18 | Emil Hoerler Jr | Bridgeport, NE 69336 | $2,233 |
19 | Louie Sauer Jr | Bayard, NE 69334 | $2,114 |
20 | Larry Kildow | Bayard, NE 69334 | $1,978 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>