Farm Subsidy information
Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska
Total Subsidies in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,630
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska totaled $249,142,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Blk Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $916,733 |
22 | J & S Brothers Farming Inc | Morrill, NE 69358 | $901,533 |
23 | Ouderkirk Ltd Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $846,119 |
24 | Lrk Farms Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $840,508 |
25 | Alex Pester | Minatare, NE 69356 | $814,442 |
26 | Platte River Basin Environments Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69363 | $798,120 |
27 | R & R Kiesel Farms Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $797,936 |
28 | Paul M Adams | Morrill, NE 69358 | $785,517 |
29 | Panhandle Pig Co | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $746,448 |
30 | Walker Farms Inc | Scottsbluff, NE 69361 | $745,508 |
31 | Senkel Farms Inc | Lyman, NE 69352 | $731,425 |
32 | B W Roberts | Bayard, NE 69334 | $674,044 |
33 | Keller Family Farms | Mitchell, NE 69357 | $648,082 |
34 | Maser Farm Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $639,752 |
35 | B & W Cattle LLC | Scottsbluff, NE 69363 | $628,923 |
36 | Circle K Ag Inc | Bayard, NE 69334 | $626,252 |
37 | John A Maser | Minatare, NE 69356 | $616,861 |
38 | Randy Huck | Bayard, NE 69334 | $607,126 |
39 | Hort Farms Inc | Lyman, NE 69352 | $596,218 |
40 | Chet Cochran Farms Inc | Gering, NE 69341 | $580,442 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”