Total Commodity Programs in Sheridan County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,678
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sheridan County, Nebraska totaled $100,730,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Shirley Ann Johnson | Rushville, NE 69360 | $622,653 |
22 | Agler Farming Inc | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $599,944 |
23 | Marcy Cattle Company | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $587,906 |
24 | Rick Strotheide | Rushville, NE 69360 | $587,728 |
25 | Stuart Allen Johnson | Rushville, NE 69360 | $585,358 |
26 | Heiting Brothers | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $577,829 |
27 | Rocking Y Feedyards, LLC | Gordon, NE 69343 | $565,673 |
28 | Roger Joseph Rasmussen | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $558,557 |
29 | Terrell Farms LLC | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $550,243 |
30 | Justin D Raymer | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $546,022 |
31 | Neal Allen Hood | Gordon, NE 69343 | $529,473 |
32 | David Janssen | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $523,038 |
33 | Ray A Reimann | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $520,380 |
34 | Dennis F Dolezal | Rushville, NE 69360 | $518,109 |
35 | Matthew B Pieper | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $514,040 |
36 | Plum Thicket Farms LLC | Gordon, NE 69343 | $510,047 |
37 | T & S Unverzagt Farms Inc | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $501,611 |
38 | Dolezal Ranch, Inc. | Rushville, NE 69360 | $500,402 |
39 | Neal H Christian | Gordon, NE 69343 | $498,258 |
40 | Johnson Lazy J Inc | Hay Springs, NE 69347 | $498,220 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”