Conservation Reserve Program in Stanton County, Nebraska, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 951
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Stanton County, Nebraska totaled $53,897,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Weldon Marotz Sr | Stanton, NE 68779 | $698,621 |
2 | Duane Hansen | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $625,263 |
3 | Alan Platt | Stanton, NE 68779 | $616,292 |
4 | Danny D Timperley | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $609,379 |
5 | Nixon Family Partnership Ltd | Norfolk, NE 68702 | $532,005 |
6 | Larkin Enterprises LLC | Lexington, KY 40513 | $523,598 |
7 | Thoragra Ltd | Wisner, NE 68791 | $491,714 |
8 | Dale And Jeanne Clark Irrv Tr | Stanton, NE 68779 | $473,262 |
9 | Leona K Paden Living Trust-leona | Norfolk, NE 68702 | $460,307 |
10 | K&b Farms | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $451,155 |
11 | Richard R Svenson Grantor Tr Of 1 | Colorado Springs, CO 80917 | $448,939 |
12 | Deanna Mesch | Grand Island, NE 68803 | $447,742 |
13 | Donald L Kilchenmann | Stanton, NE 68779 | $422,049 |
14 | Ym-2 Farms LLC | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $418,564 |
15 | Michael J Wilke | Stanton, NE 68779 | $410,916 |
16 | John M Vaught | Stanton, NE 68779 | $386,571 |
17 | Spring Brook Stock & Grain Farm P | Lincoln, NE 68506 | $386,544 |
18 | Throener Farms II | Fremont, NE 68025 | $367,807 |
19 | Bill Blank Agency Inc | Madison, NE 68748 | $363,423 |
20 | Beverly A Perkins Living Trust | Norfolk, NE 68701 | $330,087 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>