Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Washoe County, Nevada, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Washoe County, Nevada totaled $1,019,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Grove Brothers | Eagleville, CA 96110 | $139,760 |
2 | John Espil Sheep Co Inc | Sparks, NV 89436 | $117,875 |
3 | , | $107,072 | |
4 | Erquiaga Ranch | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $78,922 |
5 | Estill Ranches LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $71,069 |
6 | Coleman Valley Livestock LLC | North Powder, OR 97867 | $70,593 |
7 | John Still | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $46,460 |
8 | Archie Osborne | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $36,181 |
9 | Timothy J Lawson | Imlay, NV 89418 | $34,465 |
10 | Estill Ranches Sheep Co LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $32,175 |
11 | Robert & Debra Depaoli | Lovelock, NV 89419 | $30,912 |
12 | Martin Bunyard | Fernley, NV 89408 | $30,255 |
13 | Jack Bassett | Reno, NV 89512 | $29,712 |
14 | Tom Martinez | Lake City, CA 96115 | $25,744 |
15 | Carissa L Jones | Adel, OR 97620 | $24,201 |
16 | Eric B Choate | Lake City, CA 96115 | $22,613 |
17 | John Bunyard | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $20,716 |
18 | Timothy Reed Martinez | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $20,361 |
19 | Duck Lake Ranch LLC | Reno, NV 89521 | $16,833 |
20 | Dellis Bone | Reno, NV 89506 | $16,592 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>