Farm Subsidy information
New Hampshire
Total Subsidies in New Hampshire, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 215
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Hampshire totaled $4,604,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Newmont Farm LLC | Bradford, VT 05033 | $282,900 |
2 | Crescent Farm | Walpole, NH 03608 | $136,354 |
3 | Tullando Farm Inc | Orford, NH 03777 | $133,740 |
4 | Stuart Farm LLC | Stratham, NH 03885 | $133,598 |
5 | Highway View Farm LLC | Boscawen, NH 03303 | $133,349 |
6 | Cadillac Farms, LLC | Alstead, NH 03602 | $131,909 |
7 | Chickering Farm Inc | Westmoreland, NH 03467 | $129,939 |
8 | Windyhurst Farm Partnership | Westmoreland, NH 03467 | $128,276 |
9 | Leclair Acres Farm LLC | Claremont, NH 03743 | $127,001 |
10 | Fernald Farm Dairy LLC | Nottingham, NH 03290 | $126,372 |
11 | Putnam Farms Inc | Charlestown, NH 03603 | $125,095 |
12 | Macglaflin Farm LLC | Claremont, NH 03743 | $123,581 |
13 | Pine Lane Farm LLC | Contoocook, NH 03229 | $123,485 |
14 | Bohanan Farm | Contoocook, NH 03229 | $121,219 |
15 | Charles White & Sons | Colebrook, NH 03576 | $120,728 |
16 | Briar Stone Farm LLC | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $118,518 |
17 | Forbes Family Partnership Dba Forbes Farm Partners | Lancaster, NH 03584 | $116,943 |
18 | Daniel Sanborn | Gilmanton, NH 03237 | $109,169 |
19 | Scrutons Dairy Inc | Farmington, NH 03835 | $107,870 |
20 | Naughtaveel Farm | North Conway, NH 03860 | $96,441 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>