Total Commodity Programs in New Jersey, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,179
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in New Jersey totaled $207,659,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dacosta Blueberry Farms Inc | Hammonton, NJ 08037 | $660,073 |
42 | Atlantic Blueberry Co Inc | Hammonton, NJ 08037 | $654,642 |
43 | Kuperus Meadows | Sussex, NJ 07461 | $639,676 |
44 | Richard N Norz | Hillsborough, NJ 08844 | $632,345 |
45 | Holland Greenhouses Inc | Monroe Township, NJ 08831 | $626,883 |
46 | Zrh Farms LLC | Pedricktown, NJ 08067 | $618,735 |
47 | Hannema Bros | Oxford, NJ 07863 | $613,683 |
48 | Tuckahoe Turf Farms Inc | Hammonton, NJ 08037 | $613,379 |
49 | Myerwood Farms | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $611,174 |
50 | Gasko Family Farm | Monroe Twp, NJ 08831 | $600,875 |
51 | Naturally Beautiful Plant Product | Belvidere, NJ 07823 | $582,596 |
52 | Edward Allen | Southampton, NJ 08088 | $580,266 |
53 | Dusty Lane Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $569,031 |
54 | Glenella Dairy LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $559,967 |
55 | East Coast Sod LLC | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $535,063 |
56 | Coombs Sod Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $529,017 |
57 | R Donald Emel | Salem, NJ 08079 | $518,168 |
58 | Halka Nurseries Inc | Millstone Township, NJ 08535 | $515,298 |
59 | R M Sickler Farm LLC | Woodstown, NJ 08098 | $513,298 |
60 | Stern Farms LLC | Cream Ridge, NJ 08514 | $504,030 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”