Farm Subsidy information
New Mexico
Total Subsidies in New Mexico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 27,747
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in New Mexico totaled $2,717,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donald E & Debra L Carter | San Jon, NM 88434 | $3,087,138 |
22 | Rush Land & Cattle Co Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $3,080,995 |
23 | High Lonesome Dairy | Clovis, NM 88101 | $3,001,630 |
24 | Durrett Farms | Amarillo, TX 79102 | $2,988,088 |
25 | Danny & Terri Fish | Melrose, NM 88124 | $2,979,326 |
26 | Wayne Edward Palla | Clovis, NM 88101 | $2,923,161 |
27 | Sunripe Farms | Portales, NM 88130 | $2,921,443 |
28 | Taylor Ranch | Roswell, NM 88202 | $2,905,167 |
29 | J Stanley And Cathy Fury | Broadview, NM 88112 | $2,882,354 |
30 | Frank H And Marcella Blackburn | Clovis, NM 88101 | $2,751,983 |
31 | Gary & Karen Jackson Farms | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $2,692,190 |
32 | D & J Farms | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $2,687,146 |
33 | James L And De'aun Willoughby | Melrose, NM 88124 | $2,639,306 |
34 | Woods Farms Inc | Broadview, NM 88112 | $2,635,602 |
35 | Fury Farms Inc | Broadview, NM 88112 | $2,625,978 |
36 | Mack Kizer | Pep, NM 88126 | $2,604,846 |
37 | Branch Ranch | Lovington, NM 88260 | $2,566,538 |
38 | Norris Cattle Co LLC | Lovington, NM 88260 | $2,526,213 |
39 | Rancho La Frontera | Columbus, NM 88029 | $2,512,194 |
40 | Gordon Land And Cattle | Estancia, NM 87016 | $2,470,094 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”