Counter Cyclical Program in Lea County, New Mexico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 295
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Lea County, New Mexico totaled $13,350,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | M & G Joint Venture | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $1,026,519 |
2 | Ross Hilburn Farms | Denver City, TX 79323 | $975,244 |
3 | Gary & Karen Jackson Farms | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $639,470 |
4 | Lawrence Enterprises Limited Partnership Llp | Hobbs, NM 88242 | $568,463 |
5 | Judah Farms Jv | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $524,158 |
6 | Joe Tarbet | Lubbock, TX 79423 | $448,209 |
7 | Brian & Karen Snodgrass Farms | Seminole, TX 79360 | $435,810 |
8 | Larry Parker | Hobbs, NM 88242 | $432,477 |
9 | F & S Farms | Seminole, TX 79360 | $307,898 |
10 | Wier Brothers Inc | Lovington, NM 88260 | $296,846 |
11 | F & R Custom Farms Inc | Seminole, TX 79360 | $294,988 |
12 | Karen Jackson | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $290,437 |
13 | Gary D Jackson | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $277,215 |
14 | Kevin And Kara Love Farms | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $249,137 |
15 | John P Stroud | Denver City, TX 79323 | $241,047 |
16 | Duncan Farms Inc | Lovington, NM 88260 | $224,923 |
17 | L D Ace Hamm III | Brownfield, TX 79316 | $203,340 |
18 | Brad Palmer Farms | Plains, TX 79355 | $184,886 |
19 | Pauline Hilburn Tr | Denver City, TX 79323 | $179,029 |
20 | Choya D Young | Plains, TX 79355 | $166,244 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>