Environmental Quality Incentives Program in San Miguel County, New Mexico, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 38
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in San Miguel County, New Mexico totaled $365,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Robert M Quintana | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $49,791 |
2 | Patrick J Melton | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $43,372 |
3 | David Blagg | Santa Fe, NM 87501 | $25,693 |
4 | Lourdes V Encinias | Ribera, NM 87560 | $24,727 |
5 | Eric Biderman | Ribera, NM 87560 | $19,060 |
6 | Shirley Marrujo | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $14,457 |
7 | Monsimer Ranch Ltd Partnership | Norristown, PA 19403 | $14,169 |
8 | Alexander Millikan | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $14,147 |
9 | Virginia Lujan | Albuquerque, NM 87112 | $12,969 |
10 | Napoleon F Quintana | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $12,303 |
11 | Bill Sena | Albuquerque, NM 87110 | $11,634 |
12 | Adreien Jaramillo | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $10,783 |
13 | Tony Gabel | Logan, NM 88426 | $9,405 |
14 | Henry Higgins | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $9,077 |
15 | John Pintek | Bisbee, AZ 85603 | $9,000 |
16 | Dan P Estrada | Trementina, NM 88439 | $8,226 |
17 | Martin Brian Honegger | Newkirk, NM 88431 | $8,102 |
18 | Flavio Vigil | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $7,997 |
19 | Charlie E J Garcia | Las Vegas, NM 87701 | $6,178 |
20 | Margarito Romero | Ribera, NM 87560 | $6,024 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>