Miscellaneous Farm Programs in New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,617
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in New York totaled $36,240,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steven J Nesbitt | Waterport, NY 14571 | $150,102 |
22 | Donald Bartleson | Sodus, NY 14551 | $150,102 |
23 | Robert Fox | Williamson, NY 14589 | $150,102 |
24 | Robert L Coene | Ontario, NY 14519 | $150,102 |
25 | Scott Johnson | Sodus, NY 14551 | $150,102 |
26 | Rulfs Orchards LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $150,102 |
27 | Kast Farms Inc | Albion, NY 14411 | $150,102 |
28 | W G Minard & Sons Inc | Clintondale, NY 12515 | $150,102 |
29 | Golden Harvest Farms, Inc. | Valatie, NY 12184 | $150,102 |
30 | Mt Airy Fruit Farm Inc | Newburgh, NY 12550 | $150,102 |
31 | Coy Orchards Inc | Clintondale, NY 12515 | $150,102 |
32 | Vandewalle Fruit Farms LLC | Williamson, NY 14589 | $150,102 |
33 | Beak & Skiff Apple Farms Inc | La Fayette, NY 13084 | $150,102 |
34 | J H Verbridge & Son Inc | Williamson, NY 14589 | $150,102 |
35 | Russell Farms Inc | Appleton, NY 14008 | $150,102 |
36 | Lyn Oaken Farms Inc | Lyndonville, NY 14098 | $150,102 |
37 | Circle R Fruit Farms | Kent, NY 14477 | $150,102 |
38 | Fremouw And Son, LLC | North Rose, NY 14516 | $150,102 |
39 | Lamont Fruit Farm Inc | Waterport, NY 14571 | $150,102 |
40 | D Demarree Fruit Farm Inc | Williamson, NY 14589 | $150,102 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”