Total Commodity Programs in Chenango County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 843
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chenango County, New York totaled $44,486,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Indian Camp Farm LLC | Earlville, NY 13332 | $1,266,578 |
2 | Marshman Farms LLC | Oxford, NY 13830 | $1,231,299 |
3 | Johnson Farms LLC | New Berlin, NY 13411 | $1,125,971 |
4 | Cobar Dairy LLC | Mount Upton, NY 13809 | $917,674 |
5 | Postma Brothers LLC | New Berlin, NY 13411 | $874,258 |
6 | Happy Valley Farm | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $839,072 |
7 | Roger Agren | Georgetown, NY 13072 | $697,411 |
8 | Van Althuis Dairy LLC | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $682,343 |
9 | Robert L Frank Sr Estate Ronnie A Frank Per Rep | Oxford, NY 13830 | $628,297 |
10 | Richard E Posson | Norwich, NY 13815 | $540,451 |
11 | Cheshire Valley Farms LLC | Oxford, NY 13830 | $503,122 |
12 | Balsam View Dairy Farm LLC | Mc Donough, NY 13801 | $472,018 |
13 | Hanehan Family Dairy - LLC | Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 | $460,383 |
14 | Dean Mikalunas | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $457,564 |
15 | Peter C Lathrop | Sherburne, NY 13460 | $434,205 |
16 | Joseph Warren | Greene, NY 13778 | $425,681 |
17 | Dale Grover | Afton, NY 13730 | $357,444 |
18 | Greenview Farms LLC | Bainbridge, NY 13733 | $348,692 |
19 | Mary Klecha Conroe | Greene, NY 13778 | $344,814 |
20 | John Kemmeren | Bainbridge, NY 13733 | $332,174 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>