Total Commodity Programs in Clinton County, New York, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 784
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clinton County, New York totaled $57,667,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lance Rovers | Chazy, NY 12921 | $328,494 |
42 | Maplegrand Farms | Peru, NY 12972 | $325,402 |
43 | Bruce Trombley | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $310,006 |
44 | Wayne Decoste | Mooers Forks, NY 12959 | $298,863 |
45 | Bcs Farms | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $287,643 |
46 | Hart Apple Farms, LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $284,233 |
47 | Donald Boadway | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $276,003 |
48 | Gonyo Brothers Farms | Mooers, NY 12958 | $275,620 |
49 | Todd Giroux Dba Giroux Family Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $235,310 |
50 | Rulfs Orchards LLC | Peru, NY 12972 | $235,015 |
51 | Hidden View Farms | Champlain, NY 12919 | $231,596 |
52 | William K Ashline | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $229,174 |
53 | Cha-liz Farms | West Chazy, NY 12992 | $228,631 |
54 | Terry Boyea | Altona, NY 12910 | $224,153 |
55 | Laurin Farms | Chazy, NY 12921 | $223,302 |
56 | Paul Premo | Churubusco, NY 12923 | $217,510 |
57 | G & M Farms | Plattsburgh, NY 12901 | $217,225 |
58 | Michael Perrin | Ellenburg Depot, NY 12935 | $213,626 |
59 | Tender Timber Management | Schuyler Falls, NY 12985 | $212,061 |
60 | James Sample | Ellenburg Center, NY 12934 | $207,259 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”