Production Flexibility Program in North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 35,221
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in North Carolina totaled $394,440,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | R & W Mccoy Farms | Cove City, NC 28523 | $350,198 |
42 | Harvey Z Edge Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $343,192 |
43 | Green Valley Farms | Columbia, NC 27925 | $341,861 |
44 | Wiggins Farms | Trenton, NC 28585 | $331,332 |
45 | Josey Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $328,328 |
46 | Big M Farm | Vandemere, NC 28587 | $324,605 |
47 | Wallace & Keith Respess Farms | Pantego, NC 27860 | $324,372 |
48 | Haddock Farms Partners | Trenton, NC 28585 | $321,898 |
49 | Parnell Farms Llp | Parkton, NC 28371 | $315,694 |
50 | Jackson Brothers Farms | Turkey, NC 28393 | $315,691 |
51 | Jack Leggette Farms | Rowland, NC 28383 | $309,073 |
52 | Burgweger Farms | Brooklyn, WI 53521 | $307,875 |
53 | Jack & Don Lee Jr | Arapahoe, NC 28510 | $303,350 |
54 | Newsome Farms | Winton, NC 27986 | $298,527 |
55 | Swindell Brothers | Scranton, NC 27875 | $293,663 |
56 | Brinkley Farms Inc | Aulander, NC 27805 | $290,145 |
57 | Ventosa Plantation | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $289,973 |
58 | Sinclair Corp | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $289,269 |
59 | Matt W Ransom Iv | Little River, SC 29566 | $287,133 |
60 | Woodville Supply Co | Lewiston Woodville, NC 27849 | $285,925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”