Farm Subsidy information
Beaufort County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Beaufort County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 317
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Beaufort County, North Carolina totaled $19,841,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Howell Farms | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $690,237 |
2 | 3 B Farms Partnership | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $682,985 |
3 | Southland Farms | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $452,179 |
4 | Nbe Farms Inc | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $428,425 |
5 | Foxfire Farms Inc | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $426,367 |
6 | Tankard Farm LLC | Bath, NC 27808 | $301,723 |
7 | L H Allen & Son Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $294,688 |
8 | Harold & Susan Smith Partnership | Belhaven, NC 27810 | $285,773 |
9 | Burbage Farms Inc | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $260,751 |
10 | Grissom Farms Inc | Washington, NC 27889 | $256,168 |
11 | 3 B Ag Ventures | Pinetown, NC 27865 | $247,495 |
12 | W Haden Harris Farms Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $243,577 |
13 | Hyde Park Farms LLC | Pantego, NC 27860 | $241,014 |
14 | Cutler Farms | Pantego, NC 27860 | $235,936 |
15 | Fletcher Brothers | Pantego, NC 27860 | $226,045 |
16 | Dht Farms Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $206,495 |
17 | Michael W Bishop | Pantego, NC 27860 | $198,894 |
18 | Benson & Russ Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $195,230 |
19 | Arnold Farms Inc | Washington, NC 27889 | $193,349 |
20 | Bishop Farming Enterprises Inc | Pantego, NC 27860 | $192,427 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>