Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Chatham County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 52
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Chatham County, North Carolina totaled $526,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Theresa C Stevens | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $70,816 |
2 | Rodney L Mcneill | Goldston, NC 27252 | $41,094 |
3 | Keith A Tuttle Farms Inc | Siler City, NC 27344 | $29,921 |
4 | Phonesavan Norvang | Siler City, NC 27344 | $28,834 |
5 | B Henry Stinson | Goldston, NC 27252 | $24,487 |
6 | Richard C West | Goldston, NC 27252 | $22,768 |
7 | John S Glosson | Pittsboro, NC 27312 | $22,696 |
8 | Daniel W Gaines Jr | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $21,244 |
9 | Clarence O Talley | Siler City, NC 27344 | $19,019 |
10 | Joseph J Gilliland | Goldston, NC 27252 | $18,351 |
11 | Pine Hill Farms Of Chatham County | Goldston, NC 27252 | $18,170 |
12 | Bernard L Smith | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $17,821 |
13 | Jeffrey T Clark | Snow Camp, NC 27349 | $17,130 |
14 | Bobbie Wanda Cook | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $16,504 |
15 | Joseph B Gilliland | Goldston, NC 27252 | $16,285 |
16 | William W Beavers Jr | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $15,904 |
17 | Denson Jones | Bennett, NC 27208 | $15,712 |
18 | Phillip B Gowins | Siler City, NC 27344 | $14,072 |
19 | Todd White | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $12,966 |
20 | Jerry Wilson | Bear Creek, NC 27207 | $10,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>