Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Halifax County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 55
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Halifax County, North Carolina totaled $99,658 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Craig Perry | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $10,172 |
2 | William Bruce Davis | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $5,155 |
3 | Ronald C Fleming | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $5,000 |
4 | Carter Farms | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $5,000 |
5 | Fleming & Kitchin Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $5,000 |
6 | Jrk Farms LLC | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $5,000 |
7 | Robert Brent Fleming A & B Farms | Halifax, NC 27839 | $3,602 |
8 | John W Branham Iv | Halifax, NC 27839 | $3,375 |
9 | Wilbert T Solomon | Enfield, NC 27823 | $2,673 |
10 | Roland Hardy | Enfield, NC 27823 | $2,500 |
11 | N Justice West | Littleton, NC 27850 | $2,500 |
12 | James E Smith | Littleton, NC 27850 | $2,500 |
13 | A N Dickens Jr | Halifax, NC 27839 | $2,500 |
14 | David Iles Jr | Littleton, NC 27850 | $2,500 |
15 | Stillwaters, Inc. | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $2,500 |
16 | G E Pendleton III Farms Inc | Scotland Neck, NC 27874 | $2,500 |
17 | Isles Farms | Littleton, NC 27850 | $2,459 |
18 | Jerry Hamill Farms Inc | Enfield, NC 27823 | $2,446 |
19 | Franklin D Tripp | Halifax, NC 27839 | $2,315 |
20 | P A Carroll | Enfield, NC 27823 | $2,107 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>