Farm Subsidy information
Haywood County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Haywood County, North Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 58
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Haywood County, North Carolina totaled $825,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Triple R Dairy Farm Inc | Waynesville, NC 28785 | $134,109 |
2 | Ross Dairy Inc | Waynesville, NC 28785 | $131,046 |
3 | , | $125,434 | |
4 | Joseph Tim Smart | Clyde, NC 28721 | $67,581 |
5 | Charles F Medford | Waynesville, NC 28785 | $48,651 |
6 | Patricia Cooke Taylor | Canton, NC 28716 | $33,736 |
7 | Parkins Brothers Dairy | Clyde, NC 28721 | $32,080 |
8 | Sunburst Trout Farm LLC | Waynesville, NC 28786 | $26,336 |
9 | Lucas William Kyle | Waynesville, NC 28785 | $6,462 |
10 | Johnny Bruce Ferguson | Clyde, NC 28721 | $6,022 |
11 | Leatherwood & Sons Farm Inc | Canton, NC 28716 | $5,557 |
12 | Rafael V Vargas | Canton, NC 28716 | $5,408 |
13 | William D Hyatt | Waynesville, NC 28786 | $5,382 |
14 | Leatherwood Family Farms, Inc | Canton, NC 28716 | $4,300 |
15 | Cold Mountain Nursery Inc | Canton, NC 28716 | $2,355 |
16 | James B Robinson | Canton, NC 28716 | $1,292 |
17 | Wilburn Perry Russell Jr | Waynesville, NC 28786 | $1,218 |
18 | William G Carter | Waynesville, NC 28785 | $1,113 |
19 | James Timothy Kelley | Clyde, NC 28721 | $1,097 |
20 | Charles Ray Trantham | Canton, NC 28716 | $1,093 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>