Counter Cyclical Program in Orange County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 253
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Orange County, North Carolina totaled $113,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pheasant Field Farm LLC | Durham, NC 27717 | $1,205 |
22 | Richard Roberts | Hillsborough, NC 27278 | $1,122 |
23 | Robert C Hogan Jr | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $1,048 |
24 | William C Ray | Hillsborough, NC 27278 | $1,042 |
25 | Hoot Owl Farms Inc | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $1,037 |
26 | Michael Hall | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $937 |
27 | Randall G Lloyd | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $919 |
28 | James C Thompson | Durham, NC 27707 | $851 |
29 | William F Hogan | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $799 |
30 | Pauline Pope | Cedar Grove, NC 27231 | $656 |
31 | R Bryant Neville | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $647 |
32 | Mckewyn A Taylor | Mebane, NC 27302 | $619 |
33 | Malcolm Allison | Cedar Grove, NC 27231 | $607 |
34 | Russell Hall | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $592 |
35 | Elizabeth M Ivey | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $589 |
36 | Bruce B Cameron | Wilmington, NC 28406 | $562 |
37 | William D Berry Jr | Hurdle Mills, NC 27541 | $560 |
38 | John Tolar | Hillsborough, NC 27278 | $556 |
39 | Milton Durham | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $540 |
40 | John H Pope Jr | Cedar Grove, NC 27231 | $530 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”