Production Flexibility Program in Pasquotank County, North Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 423

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Pasquotank County, North Carolina totaled $7,855,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
1William B BatemanElizabeth City, NC 27909$219,639
2Warren Z Meads & Sons IncElizabeth City, NC 27906$202,940
3Kenneth R BatemanElizabeth City, NC 27909$189,566
4James H WinslowElizabeth City, NC 27909$187,386
5Rufus A JacksonElizabeth City, NC 27909$181,231
6Gloria DailyPlymouth, IN 46563$167,906
7Loren DailyNotre Dame, IN 46556$167,872
8M K Berry & SonElizabeth City, NC 27909$165,732
9William E SawyerVirginia Beach, VA 23456$164,935
10Jeffrey Alan SpenceElizabeth City, NC 27909$151,822
11Richard ParkerElizabeth City, NC 27909$147,754
12Billie R WinslowElizabeth City, NC 27909$147,387
13John W SpenceElizabeth City, NC 27909$140,026
14William Edward PerryElizabeth City, NC 27909$128,630
15Thomas L RogersonElizabeth City, NC 27909$126,385
16Rufus Harrell Enterprises LLCChesapeake, VA 23320$124,989
17Frederick P M SmallElizabeth City, NC 27909$124,569
18Charles Ray Gray And SonsElizabeth City, NC 27909$118,507
19Ronnie & Wayne WhiteElizabeth City, NC 27909$118,453
20P Loy HarrellWest Point, VA 23181$114,875

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag