Tobacco Transition Payment in Pitt County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 540
Recipients of Tobacco Transition Payment from farms in Pitt County, North Carolina totaled $36,952,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Transition Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Worthington Farms Inc | Greenville, NC 27834 | $1,921,764 |
2 | Robert Pierce Farms Inc | Farmville, NC 27828 | $1,105,786 |
3 | Tucker Farms Inc | Greenville, NC 27834 | $851,507 |
4 | Robert Gary Stocks | Greenville, NC 27858 | $789,877 |
5 | Sandra Stocks | Ayden, NC 28513 | $631,285 |
6 | Jack Allen Farms, LLC | Winterville, NC 28590 | $617,892 |
7 | J P Davenport & Son Inc | Greenville, NC 27834 | $543,361 |
8 | Ghb Farms Inc | Greenville, NC 27834 | $506,262 |
9 | Billy Haddock & Son Farms | Grimesland, NC 27837 | $485,004 |
10 | Frank D Dail | Farmville, NC 27828 | $481,163 |
11 | Frank Stacy Dail | Farmville, NC 27828 | $481,133 |
12 | Ronnie D Dail | Farmville, NC 27828 | $481,132 |
13 | Creston Ray Mills | Ayden, NC 28513 | $474,840 |
14 | E C Averette III | Winterville, NC 28590 | $474,377 |
15 | W C Moore | Bethel, NC 27812 | $472,679 |
16 | Graham M Mills | Greenville, NC 27858 | $466,502 |
17 | L Tyson & Sons Inc | Ayden, NC 28513 | $449,008 |
18 | Charles Herman Wainright | Winterville, NC 28590 | $442,799 |
19 | James & James Farms Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $417,968 |
20 | Kenneth Harold Smith | Ayden, NC 28513 | $401,477 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>