Farm Subsidy information

Pitt County, North Carolina

Total Subsidies in Pitt County, North Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,404

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pitt County, North Carolina totaled $305,738,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21Robert Gary StocksGreenville, NC 27858$1,756,846
22Steven Wayne StancillGreenville, NC 27834$1,751,829
23Ghb Farms IncGreenville, NC 27834$1,668,077
24Wiley Christopher StancillAyden, NC 28513$1,657,055
25Danny Lester StancillAyden, NC 28513$1,648,751
26D Howard Nanney JrFarmville, NC 27828$1,628,976
27Roland Lee Sanderson JrGrifton, NC 28530$1,600,105
28Whitehurst Farms IncStokes, NC 27884$1,553,797
29Creston Ray MillsAyden, NC 28513$1,520,814
30Gene DavenportGreenville, NC 27858$1,496,527
31Frank D DailFarmville, NC 27828$1,425,704
32Dick Mills Farms IncAyden, NC 28513$1,407,099
33Johnny & Jimmy Lewis PartnershipFarmville, NC 27828$1,402,197
34James & James Farms IncStokes, NC 27884$1,383,804
35Graham M MillsGreenville, NC 27858$1,383,044
36E C Averette IIIWinterville, NC 28590$1,379,820
37R W James & Sons LLCRobersonville, NC 27871$1,358,730
38Frank Dail Farms IncFarmville, NC 27828$1,358,223
39Manning & Carson Farms LLCBethel, NC 27812$1,348,727
40James Family FarmsRobersonville, NC 27871$1,317,268

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag