Loan Deficiency in Robeson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,139
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Robeson County, North Carolina totaled $23,270,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John M Buie | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $204,774 |
22 | Zeb B Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $198,459 |
23 | P & S Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $189,874 |
24 | S & S Swine Mgt | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $186,304 |
25 | Madison Lytch Farms | Maxton, NC 28364 | $184,226 |
26 | Hinton Mccall King | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $181,433 |
27 | Keith Adcox | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $179,395 |
28 | Stone Brothers And Sons Inc | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $176,426 |
29 | Roger Dean Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $176,032 |
30 | Smith And Barkley Ptr | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $172,331 |
31 | Stonewall Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $169,789 |
32 | Robert W Lewis | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $167,443 |
33 | Michael L Davis | Rowland, NC 28383 | $165,607 |
34 | Danny Bullard | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $156,093 |
35 | Daniel H Lewis | Orrum, NC 28369 | $152,697 |
36 | Rex A Oxendine | Rowland, NC 28383 | $152,470 |
37 | Shooter Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $149,062 |
38 | James Carey Brixey Sr | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $146,931 |
39 | Pates Supply Co Inc | Pembroke, NC 28372 | $146,229 |
40 | Elrod Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $146,044 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”