Farm Subsidy information
Robeson County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Robeson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 441 to 460 of 6,538
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Robeson County, North Carolina totaled $357,537,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
441 | James L Hayes Jr | Marietta, NC 28362 | $75,880 |
442 | Every Lee Jones | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $75,180 |
443 | Jean C Clansky | Menlo Park, CA 94025 | $74,474 |
444 | W D Mcphaul | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $74,231 |
445 | James Carey Roberts | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $74,192 |
446 | Jimmy Lee | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $74,146 |
447 | Ricky Driggers | Hamer, SC 29547 | $73,952 |
448 | Sandy Mckinnon | Rowland, NC 28383 | $73,015 |
449 | Redell A Hunt | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $71,908 |
450 | Gerald Knight Jr | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $71,721 |
451 | Newton Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $71,655 |
452 | Roy Wood Jr | Pinehurst, NC 28374 | $71,499 |
453 | C A Brown Jr | Maxton, NC 28364 | $71,357 |
454 | Sara W Cameron | Saint Pauls, NC 28384 | $70,857 |
455 | Edward Douglas Sealey | Parkton, NC 28371 | $70,172 |
456 | Charles Wallace Kinlaw | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $70,093 |
457 | F L Adams Agri Partnership | Rowland, NC 28383 | $69,873 |
458 | Butler Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $69,698 |
459 | Thompson Farms Ltd | Lumberton, NC 28360 | $69,354 |
460 | William Tyler Davis | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $69,218 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”