Farm Subsidy information
Stanly County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Stanly County, North Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 125
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stanly County, North Carolina totaled $2,178,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shelly J Smith | Norwood, NC 28128 | $102,356 |
2 | Herlocker Farms Inc | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $22,714 |
3 | R Lane Russell | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $19,623 |
4 | Landon D Bunting | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $17,136 |
5 | Chris A Furr Farms LLC | Locust, NC 28097 | $15,991 |
6 | Donnie M Brooks | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $12,505 |
7 | C E Mcswain And Sons Inc | Norwood, NC 28128 | $9,501 |
8 | Eric Blalock Farms LLC | Norwood, NC 28128 | $9,465 |
9 | Long Creek Farms Inc | New London, NC 28127 | $9,294 |
10 | Bryan Allen Burleson | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $9,115 |
11 | Simpson Family Farms | Monroe, NC 28110 | $8,792 |
12 | Fox Branch Farms LLC | Oakboro, NC 28129 | $8,605 |
13 | Big Bear Creek Farms Inc | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $8,358 |
14 | David A Underwood | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $8,264 |
15 | River Island Inc | Monroe, NC 28110 | $8,108 |
16 | Ronnie E Blalock Jr | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $8,028 |
17 | Fork L Enterprises LLC | Norwood, NC 28128 | $7,982 |
18 | Darrell L Whitley | Locust, NC 28097 | $7,565 |
19 | Richard W Smith | Locust, NC 28097 | $7,163 |
20 | Barry S Whitley | New London, NC 28127 | $7,053 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>