Production Flexibility Program in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 680
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $8,366,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stallings Farm | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $73,151 |
22 | Lamm Farms | Sims, NC 27880 | $72,857 |
23 | Hawley Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $72,366 |
24 | Hocutt Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $70,141 |
25 | Pittman Brothers Farm | Wilson, NC 27893 | $68,816 |
26 | Z Royce Bissette | Elm City, NC 27822 | $68,721 |
27 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $67,848 |
28 | Ray Flowers Estate | Elm City, NC 27822 | $64,028 |
29 | Zack R Bissette Jr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $63,436 |
30 | Edward & Hardy Pittman Partnershi | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $63,372 |
31 | John W Daniel Jr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $63,170 |
32 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $61,882 |
33 | Harrells Agri Enterprises | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $57,693 |
34 | Jeffrey L Barnes | Lucama, NC 27851 | $56,042 |
35 | Tyner Farms Partners | Elm City, NC 27822 | $54,996 |
36 | Donald Winborne | Sims, NC 27880 | $54,603 |
37 | Joseph D Gardner | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $53,539 |
38 | Mayo Farms Of Wilson Inc | Kenly, NC 27542 | $50,711 |
39 | Wiggins Farm No 2659 LLC | Wilson, NC 27894 | $50,704 |
40 | Aycock Brothers Inc | Fremont, NC 27830 | $50,244 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”