Total Commodity Programs in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,567
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $114,834,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | B F Glover Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $269,969 |
102 | Gerald L Tyner Jr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $268,456 |
103 | James Michael Mckeel | Winterville, NC 28590 | $268,412 |
104 | Randy J Aycock | Fremont, NC 27830 | $268,199 |
105 | Fresh Pik Produce Inc | Kenly, NC 27542 | $267,845 |
106 | Boyette & Boyette Farms Inc | Kenly, NC 27542 | $266,734 |
107 | William S Bass Jr | Lucama, NC 27851 | $263,386 |
108 | Lucky Four Farms Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $259,300 |
109 | Mark Allan Nichols | Bailey, NC 27807 | $257,970 |
110 | Woodbridge Farms | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $256,148 |
111 | Jeff Bass | Wilson, NC 27893 | $248,946 |
112 | West Farms | Fremont, NC 27830 | $245,651 |
113 | Donald Mack Barnes | Kenly, NC 27542 | $239,182 |
114 | Robert D Robbins | Sharpsburg, NC 27878 | $235,732 |
115 | Gerald L Tyner | Elm City, NC 27822 | $235,405 |
116 | Woodrow W Flowers Jr | Sims, NC 27880 | $232,365 |
117 | Evans Farms Inc | Fremont, NC 27830 | $225,263 |
118 | Jeffrey Scott Boykin | Sims, NC 27880 | $219,017 |
119 | Albert Adrian Bass | Black Creek, NC 27813 | $210,951 |
120 | Donnie Tyner Farms Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $210,795 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”