Counter Cyclical Program in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 434
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $11,110,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $542,247 |
2 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $494,896 |
3 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $465,120 |
4 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $402,596 |
5 | Tyner Farms Partners | Elm City, NC 27822 | $386,794 |
6 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $368,788 |
7 | Williford Sons | Elm City, NC 27822 | $330,230 |
8 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $265,929 |
9 | David L Bunting Sr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $235,168 |
10 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $233,875 |
11 | Earl Sullivan | Lucama, NC 27851 | $227,019 |
12 | Stallings Farm | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $217,790 |
13 | Todd Glover Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27896 | $197,103 |
14 | B F Glover Farms LLC | Elm City, NC 27822 | $188,207 |
15 | Sharp Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $181,937 |
16 | Pearson Farm No 1928 Part | Wilson, NC 27894 | $181,667 |
17 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $167,771 |
18 | R B Lancaster & Sons Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $163,925 |
19 | Wainwright Farms | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $151,995 |
20 | Batts Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $150,871 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>