Total Commodity Programs in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,567
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $114,834,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | J L Sharpe Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $358,288 |
82 | Futrell Brothers | Lucama, NC 27851 | $353,002 |
83 | William R Williamson | Wilson, NC 27895 | $339,119 |
84 | James A Miller | Sims, NC 27880 | $339,030 |
85 | Joseph D Gardner | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $336,920 |
86 | Woodard Farm No 1842 Part | Wilson, NC 27894 | $336,792 |
87 | Glenn Bryant | Wilson, NC 27895 | $327,162 |
88 | Donnie Hugh Baker Jr | Fountain, NC 27829 | $321,930 |
89 | Nichols & Nichols Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $319,027 |
90 | E L Thigpen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27893 | $306,118 |
91 | Louis N Wooten | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $304,859 |
92 | John Lloyd Sharpe Jr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $304,789 |
93 | Robert Lemuel Dawson | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $300,014 |
94 | Kermit Wayne Aycock | Lucama, NC 27851 | $299,356 |
95 | Pittman Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27893 | $297,945 |
96 | Henry E Evans | Wilson, NC 27893 | $296,778 |
97 | A K Ellis Farms Inc | Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480 | $293,841 |
98 | Davis Farms | Sharpsburg, NC 27878 | $279,976 |
99 | Bailey Brothers Farms | Bailey, NC 27807 | $279,680 |
100 | Michael W Bunting | Elm City, NC 27822 | $277,905 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”