Total Commodity Programs in Adams County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 410
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $7,128,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Terry Roy West | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $57,890 |
42 | Buckmier Brothers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $57,297 |
43 | J & M Farms Ltd | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $55,571 |
44 | Commercial Bank Of Mott ** | Mott, ND 58646 | $53,673 |
45 | Gregory Lyle Seamands | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $49,844 |
46 | Jamie Lynn Enerson | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $48,265 |
47 | David Sonn | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $46,955 |
48 | Victoria L Sonn | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $46,955 |
49 | Grand River Honey Company | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $45,229 |
50 | Jon Harvey Markegard | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $45,221 |
51 | Rodney Wayne Lutz | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $41,636 |
52 | Eugene Charles Burrer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $40,346 |
53 | Danny Duane Engraf | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $40,097 |
54 | Kiley Sonn | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $38,258 |
55 | Dakota Western Bank ** | Bowman, ND 58623 | $37,175 |
56 | William David Larson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $35,045 |
57 | Scott Lauren Zimmermann | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $32,651 |
58 | Barbara Rose | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $31,975 |
59 | Bradley Paul Lee | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $31,082 |
60 | Mitch Miller Estate | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $30,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”