Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 184
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $2,126,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hofland Ranch | Reeder, ND 58649 | $263,218 |
2 | Frank Eaton And Sons | Lindsay, MT 59339 | $181,063 |
3 | Jeremy Lynn Stadheim | Reeder, ND 58649 | $110,099 |
4 | Michael David Merwin | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $99,978 |
5 | Celestine P Slater | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $87,144 |
6 | Robert Kilzer | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $69,684 |
7 | Douglas A Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $65,856 |
8 | Thomas N Rusch | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $56,088 |
9 | Donald Robert Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $50,044 |
10 | Ehlers Ranch Inc | Reeder, ND 58649 | $45,335 |
11 | Rodney Erwin Wolff | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $43,109 |
12 | Cody Johnson | Baker, MT 59313 | $34,671 |
13 | Brad Sigvaldsen | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $30,868 |
14 | Ardmore William Thompson | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $30,245 |
15 | Larry Ray Johnson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $29,721 |
16 | Roger Hirsch | Mott, ND 58646 | $27,743 |
17 | Ron Allen Zimmermann | Lone Tree, CO 80124 | $25,507 |
18 | Gene E & Marilyn A Engraf Joint V | Reeder, ND 58649 | $23,172 |
19 | Eugene Charles Burrer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $21,747 |
20 | Mark Don Evans | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $20,556 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>