Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,710
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $265,975,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David Sonn | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $1,126,844 |
22 | Ryan Ray Honeyman | Reeder, ND 58649 | $1,114,586 |
23 | John Allen Weaver | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $1,075,504 |
24 | Linda Lee Doe | Reeder, ND 58649 | $1,020,709 |
25 | Terry Roy West | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $1,014,730 |
26 | Dennis Alan Markegard | Golden Valley, MN 55422 | $1,013,412 |
27 | Roger D Wilson | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $1,003,823 |
28 | Jordan Jacob Christman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $1,003,226 |
29 | James Kilzer | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $958,080 |
30 | Ben O Eaton | Reeder, ND 58649 | $917,341 |
31 | Burnell Roger Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $915,010 |
32 | Barbara Rose | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $884,046 |
33 | Raymond Mattis | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $855,005 |
34 | Lewellyn Lee Honeyman | Reeder, ND 58649 | $835,059 |
35 | Scott Edward Mattis | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $828,680 |
36 | Thomas Dean Arndorfer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $805,705 |
37 | Nathan Burnell Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $803,494 |
38 | Beverly Rose Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $790,112 |
39 | Alfred Rose Jr | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $790,004 |
40 | Wilbur Hintz | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $768,470 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”