Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,763
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $302,414,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Randy Gene Friez | Mott, ND 58646 | $685,997 |
62 | Bruce Glenn Erickson | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $676,591 |
63 | Marlin Dulane Knutson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $676,246 |
64 | Miller Farm & Ranch | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $666,670 |
65 | Danny Duane Engraf | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $646,428 |
66 | Douglas Bruce Donner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $632,998 |
67 | Brian Terry Gravning | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $628,853 |
68 | Scott Seim | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $627,396 |
69 | James Alan Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $627,062 |
70 | Rhett L Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $623,581 |
71 | Delbert Duane Hintz | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $612,512 |
72 | Eugene Charles Burrer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $608,476 |
73 | Terry Michael Miller | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $596,053 |
74 | Douglas John Schackow | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $581,669 |
75 | Dustin Michael Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $575,574 |
76 | Marguerite Schmaltz | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $566,810 |
77 | Lance D Ketterling | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $556,272 |
78 | Sherrie Feist | Enning, SD 57737 | $555,722 |
79 | Mitch Bradan Miller | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $552,389 |
80 | Hofland Ranch | Reeder, ND 58649 | $547,523 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”