Production Flexibility Program in Barnes County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,438
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $55,180,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dean Leroy Karges | Oriska, ND 58063 | $217,317 |
22 | Nelson Farms | Litchville, ND 58461 | $212,586 |
23 | Conservation Develop Coop | Tower City, ND 58071 | $211,086 |
24 | Larry Lyle Svenningsen | Luverne, ND 58056 | $210,860 |
25 | Eldon Maasjo | Valley City, ND 58072 | $209,402 |
26 | Henderson Farms Inc | Tower City, ND 58071 | $207,403 |
27 | Dpk Inc | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $207,156 |
28 | Robert Donald Klein Jr | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $206,860 |
29 | S & K Farms | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $205,516 |
30 | Gary Norman Jorissen | Dazey, ND 58429 | $202,710 |
31 | Gary Reuben Lindemann | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $199,800 |
32 | William Roy Winter | Valley City, ND 58072 | $195,968 |
33 | Phillip Mueller | Valley City, ND 58072 | $194,160 |
34 | Bruce Shanenko | Valley City, ND 58072 | $193,782 |
35 | Greg Shanenko | Valley City, ND 58072 | $193,782 |
36 | R & D Rose Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $193,543 |
37 | Michael John Clemens | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $189,794 |
38 | Paul Allen Henderson | Tower City, ND 58071 | $188,088 |
39 | Brion Jay Henderson | Tower City, ND 58071 | $188,088 |
40 | Ronald David Kohler | Tower City, ND 58071 | $187,093 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”